![]() ![]() Wong GK, Lam S, Ngai K, Wong A, Mok V, Poon WS, et al. Mini-Mental State Examination versus Montreal Cognitive Assessment: rapid assessment tools for cognitive and functional outcome after aneurysmal subarachnoid hemorrhage. Cognitive and functional outcome after aneurysmal subarachnoid hemorrhage. Call for uniform neuropsychological assessment after aneurysmal subarachnoid hemorrhage: swiss recommendations. Zweifel-Zehnder AE, Stienen MN, Chicherio C, Studerus-Germann A, Blasi S, Rossi S, et al. Montreal Cognitive Assessment cognitive evaluation intensive care unit neuropsychological assessment neuropsychology reliability stroke test quality. This finding is helpful for patient care and studies investigating the effect of a therapeutic intervention on the neuropsychological outcome after SAH, stroke or traumatic brain injury. Conclusions: The reliability of the MoCA was excellent, independent from the testing environment being ICU or office. There was no location effect ( p = 0.31) with ΔMoCA between locations (Office minus ICU) of -0.32 (SD 2.21). On the 2nd period, participants scored 0.96 points worse (SD 2.01 p = 0.001), indicating no MoCA learning effect but a possible difference in parallel versions. ![]() The assessment's sequence did not influence the MoCA ( p = 0.47). Results: N = 50 patients were studied, with a mean age of 57 years. For repeated MoCA, we determined sequence, period, location effects, and the intraclass correlation coefficient (ICC). ![]() The sequence of assessment was randomized into (a) busy ICU first or (b) quiet office first with subsequent crossover. Methods: Consecutive stable patients with recent brain injury (tumor, trauma, stroke, etc.) were evaluated twice within 36 h using official parallel versions of the MoCA (ΔMoCA). We aimed to study the reliability of the Montreal Cognitive Assessment (MoCA) in the ICU environment. It is often performed during the surveillance period on the intensive (ICU), while it remains unknown, whether the distraction in this environment influences the results. Specifically developed normative data must be adopted for using MoCA in serial cognitive assessments for clinical and research studies.Background: Neuropsychological screening becomes increasingly important for the evaluation of subarachnoid hemorrhage (SAH) and stroke patients. The three MoCA forms are not strictly parallel. 001) adjusted total scores with MMSE adjusted scores. ![]() Correlation analysis showed strong correlations of MoCA 2 (r = 0.69, p <. Inferential cutoff for adjusted scores, estimated using a non-parametric technique, were 17.49 for MoCA 2 and 18.34 for MoCA 3. From the derived linear equation, correction grids for MoCA 2 and 3 raw scores were built and equivalent scores computed. Multiple linear regression analysis revealed that age and education significantly influenced MoCA 2 and 3 total scores. A three-step procedure complemented by confirmatory factor analysis and a mixed factorial ANOVA suggested that the three MoCA versions are not strictly parallel. Three separate convenience samples were recruited: the first (n = 78) completed three alternate MoCA versions for ascertaining inter-form parallelism the second (n = 302) and the third (n = 413) samples were administered MoCA 2 or 3 to compute normative data. Alternate forms of the MoCA were developed to avoid "learning effect" in serial assessments, and the present study aimed at investigating inter-form parallelism and at providing normative values for the Italian versions of MoCAs 2 and 3. The Montreal Cognitive Assessment (MoCA) is a screening test widely used in clinical practice and suited for detection of Mild Cognitive Impairment. ![]()
0 Comments
Leave a Reply.AuthorWrite something about yourself. No need to be fancy, just an overview. ArchivesCategories |